↓ Skip to main content

Lipid-Modifying Therapies and Risk of Pancreatitis: A Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lipid-Modifying Therapies and Risk of Pancreatitis: A Meta-analysis
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2012
DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.8439
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Preiss, Matti J. Tikkanen, Paul Welsh, Ian Ford, Laura C. Lovato, Marshall B. Elam, John C. LaRosa, David A. DeMicco, Helen M. Colhoun, Ilan Goldenberg, Michael J. Murphy, Thomas M. MacDonald, Terje R. Pedersen, Anthony C. Keech, Paul M Ridker, John Kjekshus, Naveed Sattar, John J. V. McMurray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,382,812
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#13,518
of 36,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,394
of 190,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#71
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.