| Title |
Potentially threatened: a Data Deficient flag for conservation management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1164-0 |
| Authors |
Ivan Jarić, Franck Courchamp, Jörn Gessner, David L. Roberts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 30% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,995,457
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#780
of 2,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,349
of 373,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#23
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.