| Title |
Patient Perspectives of Clinical Care and Patient Navigation in Follow-up of Abnormal Mammography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-010-1436-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen Donelan, Johanna R. Mailhot, David Dutwin, Kristen Barnicle, Sarah Abernethy Oo, Karin Hobrecker, Sanja Percac-Lima, Bruce A. Chabner |
| Abstract |
Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer care and survival are well documented. Patient navigation has been shown to improve timely follow-up of abnormal breast screenings for underserved patients. Few studies showed the impact of navigation on patient experiences of care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 17% |
| Psychology | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,057
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,986
of 97,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#34
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.