↓ Skip to main content

The Ethics of Cloud Computing

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
479 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Ethics of Cloud Computing
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11948-016-9759-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boudewijn de Bruin, Luciano Floridi

Abstract

Cloud computing is rapidly gaining traction in business. It offers businesses online services on demand (such as Gmail, iCloud and Salesforce) and allows them to cut costs on hardware and IT support. This is the first paper in business ethics dealing with this new technology. It analyzes the informational duties of hosting companies that own and operate cloud computing datacentres (e.g., Amazon). It considers the cloud services providers leasing 'space in the cloud' from hosting companies (e.g., Dropbox, Salesforce). And it examines the business and private 'clouders' using these services. The first part of the paper argues that hosting companies, services providers and clouders have mutual informational (epistemic) obligations to provide and seek information about relevant issues such as consumer privacy, reliability of services, data mining and data ownership. The concept of interlucency is developed as an epistemic virtue governing ethically effective communication. The second part considers potential forms of government restrictions on or proscriptions against the development and use of cloud computing technology. Referring to the concept of technology neutrality, it argues that interference with hosting companies and cloud services providers is hardly ever necessary or justified. It is argued, too, however, that businesses using cloud services (e.g., banks, law firms, hospitals etc. storing client data in the cloud) will have to follow rather more stringent regulations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 479 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 476 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 124 26%
Student > Master 80 17%
Student > Bachelor 39 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 6%
Researcher 18 4%
Other 51 11%
Unknown 139 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 200 42%
Business, Management and Accounting 47 10%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Engineering 16 3%
Arts and Humanities 12 3%
Other 41 9%
Unknown 145 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,360,845
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#425
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,415
of 301,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.