↓ Skip to main content

Sublating the free will problematic: powers, agency and causal determination

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Sublating the free will problematic: powers, agency and causal determination
Published in
Synthese, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1124-y
Authors

Ruth Groff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 44%
Social Sciences 2 22%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,113,614
of 25,468,789 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,479
of 2,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,585
of 368,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,789 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.