↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Child-Directed Speech on Word Learning and Comprehension

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
The Influence of Child-Directed Speech on Word Learning and Comprehension
Published in
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10936-016-9441-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cassandra Foursha-Stevenson, Taylor Schembri, Elena Nicoladis, Cody Eriksen

Abstract

This paper describes an investigation into the function of child-directed speech (CDS) across development. In the first experiment, 10-21-month-olds were presented with familiar words in CDS and trained on novel words in CDS or adult-directed speech (ADS). All children preferred the matching display for familiar words. However, only older toddlers in the CDS condition preferred the matching display for novel words. In Experiment 2, children 3-6 years of age were presented with a sentence comprehension task in CDS or ADS. Older children performed better overall than younger children with 5- and 6-year-olds performing above chance regardless of speech condition, while 3- and 4-year-olds only performed above chance when the sentences were presented in CDS. These findings provide support for the theory that CDS is most effective at the beginning of acquisition for particular constructions (e.g. vocabulary acquisition, syntactic comprehension) rather than at a particular age or for a particular task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 24%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 35%
Linguistics 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#15,708,425
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
#176
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,286
of 354,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.