You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Insects cannot tell us anything about subjective experience or the origin of consciousness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1606835113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian Key, Robert Arlinghaus, Howard I. Browman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 35% |
| Germany | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Japan | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
| Scientists | 8 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,383,736
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#27,794
of 103,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,430
of 367,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#408
of 880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.