You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bayesian nitrate source apportionment to individual groundwater wells in the Central Valley by use of elemental and isotopic tracers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water Resources Research, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2015wr018523 |
| Authors |
Katherine M. Ransom, Mark N. Grote, Amanda Deinhart, Gary Eppich, Carol Kendall, Matthew E. Sanborn, A. Kate Souders, Joshua Wimpenny, Qing‐zhu Yin, Megan Young, Thomas Harter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 21% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,908,476
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#3,639
of 5,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,553
of 373,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#26
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.