You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seeking convergence on the key concepts in ‘no net loss’ policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12726 |
| Authors |
Joseph W. Bull, Ascelin Gordon, James E. M. Watson, Martine Maron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 38 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,182,526
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,336
of 4,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,716
of 377,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#42
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.