↓ Skip to main content

Intermediate versus standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation and statin therapy versus placebo in critically-ill patients with COVID-19: Rationale and design of the INSPIRATION/INSPIRATION-S studies

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Research, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 4,266)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
55 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
Title
Intermediate versus standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation and statin therapy versus placebo in critically-ill patients with COVID-19: Rationale and design of the INSPIRATION/INSPIRATION-S studies
Published in
Thrombosis Research, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.09.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Behnood Bikdeli, Azita H Talasaz, Farid Rashidi, Babak Sharif-Kashani, Mohsen Farrokhpour, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Hashem Sezavar, Ali Dabbagh, Mohammad Taghi Beigmohammadi, Pooya Payandemehr, Mahdi Yadollahzadeh, Taghi Riahi, Hossein Khalili, Sepehr Jamalkhani, Parisa Rezaeifar, Atefeh Abedini, Somayeh Lookzadeh, Shaghayegh Shahmirzaei, Ouria Tahamtan, Samira Matin, Ahmad Amin, Seyed Ehsan Parhizgar, David Jimenez, Aakriti Gupta, Mahesh V Madhavan, Sahil A Parikh, Manuel Monreal, Naser Hadavand, Alireza Hajighasemi, Majid Maleki, Saeed Sadeghian, Bahram Mohebbi, Gregory Piazza, Ajay J Kirtane, Gregory Y H Lip, Harlan M Krumholz, Samuel Z Goldhaber, Parham Sadeghipour

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 240 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Master 18 8%
Other 17 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 90 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 8%
Engineering 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 92 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#765,434
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Research
#28
of 4,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,968
of 430,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Research
#4
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.