| Title |
A computational procedure for estimation of the mixing time of the random-scan Metropolis algorithm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Statistics and Computing, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11222-015-9568-3 |
| Authors |
David A. Spade |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 83% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 4 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,896,872
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Statistics and Computing
#98
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,029
of 262,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistics and Computing
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.