↓ Skip to main content

Field Evaluation of Repellent Formulations Against Daytime and Nighttime Biting Mosquitoes in a Tropical Rainforest in Northern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Entomology, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field Evaluation of Repellent Formulations Against Daytime and Nighttime Biting Mosquitoes in a Tropical Rainforest in Northern Australia
Published in
Journal of Medical Entomology, May 2002
DOI 10.1603/0022-2585-39.3.541
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. P. Frances, Nguyen Van Dung, N. W. Beebe, Mustapha Debboun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,266,354
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Entomology
#287
of 3,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,465
of 120,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Entomology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.