↓ Skip to main content

2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillationAn update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillationDeveloped with the special…

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1044 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillationAn update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillationDeveloped with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association
Published in
European Heart Journal, August 2012
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs253
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. John Camm, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Raffaele De Caterina, Irene Savelieva, Dan Atar, Stefan H. Hohnloser, Gerhard Hindricks, Paulus Kirchhof, Jeroen J. Bax, Helmut Baumgartner, Claudio Ceconi, Veronica Dean, Christi Deaton, Robert Fagard, Christian Funck-Brentano, David Hasdai, Arno Hoes, Paulus Kirchhof, Juhani Knuuti, Philippe Kolh, Theresa McDonagh, Cyril Moulin, Bogdan A. Popescu, Željko Reiner, Udo Sechtem, Per Anton Sirnes, Michal Tendera, Adam Torbicki, Alec Vahanian, Stephan Windecker, Panos Vardas, Nawwar Al-Attar, Ottavio Alfieri, Annalisa Angelini, Carina Blömstrom-Lundqvist, Paolo Colonna, Johan De Sutter, Sabine Ernst, Andreas Goette, Bulent Gorenek, Robert Hatala, Hein Heidbüchel, Magnus Heldal, Steen Dalby Kristensen, Philippe Kolh, Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, Hercules Mavrakis, Lluís Mont, Pasquale Perrone Filardi, Piotr Ponikowski, Bernard Prendergast, Frans H. Rutten, Ulrich Schotten, Isabelle C. Van Gelder, Freek W.A. Verheugt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,044 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 5 <1%
Italy 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 1006 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 123 12%
Other 120 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 114 11%
Student > Master 112 11%
Student > Postgraduate 100 10%
Other 308 30%
Unknown 167 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 646 62%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 39 4%
Engineering 28 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 2%
Other 70 7%
Unknown 213 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#278,249
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#474
of 11,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,303
of 189,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#2
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.