↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effective fuel treatment planning: a theoretical justification and case study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Wildland Fire, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effective fuel treatment planning: a theoretical justification and case study
Published in
International Journal of Wildland Fire, January 2020
DOI 10.1071/wf18187
Authors

Jason Kreitler, Matthew P. Thompson, Nicole M. Vaillant, Todd J. Hawbaker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Wildland Fire
#686
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,533
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Wildland Fire
#51
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.