| Title |
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32008-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan P Barbaro, Graeme MacLaren, Philip S Boonstra, Theodore J Iwashyna, Arthur S Slutsky, Eddy Fan, Robert H Bartlett, Joseph E Tonna, Robert Hyslop, Jeffrey J Fanning, Peter T Rycus, Steve J Hyer, Marc M Anders, Cara L Agerstrand, Katarzyna Hryniewicz, Rodrigo Diaz, Roberto Lorusso, Alain Combes, Daniel Brodie, Peta Alexander, Nicholas Barrett, Jan Bělohlávek, Dale Fisher, John Fraser, Ali Ait Hssain, Jae Sung Jung, Michael McMullan, Yatin Mehta, Mark T. Ogino, Matthew L. Paden, Kiran Shekar, Christine Stead, Yasir Abu-Omar, Vanni Agnoletti, Anzila Akbar, Huda Alfoudri, Carlos Alviar, Vladimir Aronsky, Erin August, Georg Auzinger, Hilda Aveja, Rhonda Bakken, Joan Balcells, Sripal Bangalore, Bernard W. Barnes, Alaiza Bautista, Lorraine L. Bellows, Felipe Beltran, Peyman Benharash, Marco Benni, Jennifer Berg, Pietro Bertini, Pablo Blanco-Schweizer, Melissa Brunsvold, Jenny Budd, Debra Camp, Mark Caridi-Scheible, Edmund Carton, Elena Casanova-Ghosh, Anthony Castleberry, Christopher T. Chipongian, Chang Woo Choi, Alessandro Circelli, Elliott Cohen, Michael Collins, Scott Copus, Jill Coy, Brandon Crist, Leonora Cruz, Mirosław Czuczwar, Mani Daneshmand, Daniel Davis, Kim De la Cruz, Cyndie Devers, Toni Duculan, Lucian Durham, Subbarao Elapavaluru, Carlos V. Elzo Kraemer, EDMÍLSON CARDOSO Filho, Jillian Fitzgerald, Giuseppe Foti, Matthew Fox, David Fritschen, David Fullerton, Elton Gelandt, Stacy Gerle, Marco Giani, Si Guim Goh, Sara Govener, Julie Grone, Miles Guber, Vadim Gudzenko, Daniel Gutteridge, Jennifer Guy, Jonathan Haft, Cameron Hall, Ibrahim Fawzy Hassan, Rubén Herrán, Hitoshi Hirose, Abdulsalam Saif Ibrahim, Don Igielski, Felicia A. Ivascu, Jaume Izquierdo Blasco, Julie Jackson, Harsh Jain, Bhavini Jaiswal, Andrea C. Johnson, Jenniver A. Jurynec, Norma M Kellter, Adam Kohl, Zachary Kon, Markus Kredel, Karen Kriska, Chandra Kunavarapu, Oude Lansink-Hartgring, Jeliene LaRocque, Sharon Beth Larson, Tracie Layne, Stephane Ledot, Napolitan Lena, Jonathan Lillie, Gösta Lotz, Mark Lucas, Lee Ludwigson, Jacinta J. Maas, Joanna Maertens, David Mast, Scott McCardle, Bernard McDonald, Allison McLarty, Chelsea McMahon, Patrick Meybohm, Bart Meyns, Casey Miller, Fernando Moraes Neto, Kelly Morris, Ralf Muellenbach, Meghan Nicholson, Serena O'Brien, Kathryn O'Keefe, Tawnya Ogston, Gary Oldenburg, Fabiana M. Oliveira, Emily Oppel, Diego Pardo, Diego Pardo, Sara J. Parker, Finn M. Pedersen, Crescens Pellecchia, Jose A.S. Pelligrini, Thao T.N. Pham, Ann R. Phillips, Tasneem Pirani, Paweł Piwowarczyk, Robert Plambeck, William Pruett, Brittany Quandt, Kollengode Ramanathan, Alejandro Rey, Christian Reyher, Jordi Riera del Brio, Rachel Roberts, David Roe, Peter P. Roeleveld, Janet Rudy, Luis F. Rueda, Emanuele Russo, Jesús Sánchez Ballesteros, Nancy Satou, Mauricio Guidi Saueressig, Paul C. Saunders, Margaret Schlotterbeck, Patricia Schwarz, Nicole Scriven, Alexis Serra, Mohammad Shamsah, Lucy Sim, Alexandra Smart, Adam Smith, Deane Smith, Maggie Smith, Neel Sodha, Michael Sonntagbauer, Marc Sorenson, Eric B Stallkamp, Allison Stewart, Kathy Swartz, Koji Takeda, Shaun Thompson, Bridget Toy, Divina Tuazon, Makoto Uchiyama, Obiora I. Udeozo, Scott van Poppel, Corey Ventetuolo, Leen Vercaemst, Nguyen V. Vinh Chau, I-Wen Wang, Carrie Williamson, Brock Wilson, Helen Winkels |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 301 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 74 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 9% |
| Spain | 12 | 4% |
| Italy | 10 | 3% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| Japan | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 102 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 186 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 59 | 20% |
| Scientists | 50 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 602 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 602 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 78 | 13% |
| Other | 71 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 119 | 20% |
| Unknown | 199 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 237 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 2% |
| Engineering | 11 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 73 | 12% |
| Unknown | 220 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 523. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#48,954
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#909
of 42,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,729
of 432,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#40
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.