| Title |
Skin tumours and skin aging in 209 French elderly people: the PROOF study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Dermatology, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1684/ejd.2016.2838 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisa Cinotti, Jean Luc Perrot, Bruno Labeille, Anne Catherine Biron, Andrea Vierkötter, Catherine Heusèle, Carine Nizard, Sylvianne Schnebert, Jean Claude Barthelemy, Frédéric Cambazard |
| Abstract |
Few studies have evaluated the prevalence of skin tumours in the geriatric population and none have analysed different skin aging parameters for whole-body skin in this population. To evaluate the prevalence of skin tumours and global skin aging in a French cohort of old people. In total, 209 subjects, 105 women and 104 men (mean age: 77.5; range: 74-81 years), were enrolled from the PROOF (PROgnostic indicator OF cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events) cohort. SCINEXA (SCore for INtrinsic and EXtrinsic skin Aging) was used to assess the degree of skin aging and the prevalence of skin tumours. Some additional cutaneous parameters were also studied. Skin aging in women and men was compared. Mean global SCINEXA was 24.3 (SD: 4.7; range: 8.2-35.3). Solar elastosis and lax appearance were more severe in women (t test; p<0.0001), whereas pseudoscars (t test; p = 0.0312) and coarse wrinkles (t test; p = 0.0479) were more severe in men. Eritrosis coli (chi-square test; p <0.0001) was more frequent in men, whereas varicous veins (chi-square test; p = 0.0026) and eyelid xanthomas (chi-square test; p = 0.0282) were more frequent in women. Twelve patients presented with cutaneous carcinomas and two patients had early melanomas. This research describes in detail the main indices of skin aging in an old population and the differences related to sex. Moreover, it highlights the utility of systematic screening of old patients by dermatologists in order to diagnose skin cancers early. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Dermatology
#344
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,827
of 319,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Dermatology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.