↓ Skip to main content

Lifelong Reduction of LDL-Cholesterol Related to a Common Variant in the LDL-Receptor Gene Decreases the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease—A Mendelian Randomisation Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lifelong Reduction of LDL-Cholesterol Related to a Common Variant in the LDL-Receptor Gene Decreases the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease—A Mendelian Randomisation Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002986
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Linsel-Nitschke, Anika Götz, Jeanette Erdmann, Ingrid Braenne, Peter Braund, Christian Hengstenberg, Klaus Stark, Marcus Fischer, Stefan Schreiber, Nour Eddine El Mokhtari, Arne Schaefer, Jürgen Schrezenmeier, Diana Rubin, Anke Hinney, Thomas Reinehr, Christian Roth, Jan Ortlepp, Peter Hanrath, Alistair S. Hall, Massimo Mangino, Wolfgang Lieb, Claudia Lamina, Iris M. Heid, Angela Doering, Christian Gieger, Annette Peters, Thomas Meitinger, H.-Erich Wichmann, Inke R. König, Andreas Ziegler, Florian Kronenberg, Nilesh J. Samani, Heribert Schunkert, for the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium and the Cardiogenics Consortium

Abstract

Rare mutations of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene (LDLR) cause familial hypercholesterolemia, which increases the risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). Less is known about the implications of common genetic variation in the LDLR gene regarding the variability of cholesterol levels and risk of CAD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Greece 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 122 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,734,892
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,210
of 196,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,528
of 83,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#65
of 432 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 432 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.