You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strengthening maternal immunisation to improve the health of mothers and infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30882-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jon S Abramson, Elizabeth Mason |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 32% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,646,581
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#11,084
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,825
of 367,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#169
of 387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.