↓ Skip to main content

Preventing Sudden Death in the Adult with Congenital Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Current Cardiology Reports, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Preventing Sudden Death in the Adult with Congenital Heart Disease
Published in
Current Cardiology Reports, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11886-011-0189-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronn E. Tanel

Abstract

Adults with repaired congenital heart disease represent a complex and heterogeneous group of patients that are increasingly surviving beyond childhood. Patients have a variety of diagnoses that include specific structural anomalies, assorted physiologic derangements, and unique techniques for surgical repair. During long-term follow-up, even the most excellent surgical outcome may result in anatomic stenosis and insufficiency, cardiac rhythm disturbance, and myocardial dysfunction. Any of these abnormalities, alone or in combination, may result in significant morbidity and mortality. Sudden death is commonly due to a cardiac etiology and arrhythmias are frequently suspected to be the cause. Unfortunately, arrhythmias are difficult to predict and may be potentially lethal at their initial presentation. In addition, a wide spectrum of arrhythmias, both supraventricular and ventricular, are possible, depending on the specific diagnosis and type of repair performed. This review will focus primarily on arrhythmias as a cause of sudden cardiac death in this patient population. Particularly important considerations regarding arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease include the fact that supraventricular arrhythmias may be as lethal as ventricular arrhythmias, arrhythmia substrates develop in a unique manner when compared with other adult cohorts, and the electrophysiologic status of patients with repaired congenital heart disease must be considered together with the hemodynamic result.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Other 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,249,959
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Current Cardiology Reports
#605
of 995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,374
of 109,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Cardiology Reports
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.