Title |
Making the WTO (Not So) Great Again: The Case Against Responding to the Trump Trade Agenda Through Reform of WTO Rules on Subsidies and State Enterprises
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of International Economic Law, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1093/jiel/jgaa017 |
Authors |
Robert Howse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
Belgium | 2 | 7% |
Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
India | 2 | 7% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Greece | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
Scientists | 9 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Librarian | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 7 | 27% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,737,428
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Economic Law
#50
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,931
of 427,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Economic Law
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.