↓ Skip to main content

Information coding in a laminar computational model of cat primary visual cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Information coding in a laminar computational model of cat primary visual cortex
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10827-012-0420-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gleb Basalyga, Marcelo A. Montemurro, Thomas Wennekers

Abstract

Neural populations across cortical layers perform different computational tasks. However, it is not known whether information in different layers is encoded using a common neural code or whether it depends on the specific layer. Here we studied the laminar distribution of information in a large-scale computational model of cat primary visual cortex. We analyzed the amount of information about the input stimulus conveyed by the different representations of the cortical responses. In particular, we compared the information encoded in four possible neural codes: (1) the information carried by the firing rate of individual neurons; (2) the information carried by spike patterns within a time window; (3) the rate-and-phase information carried by the firing rate labelled by the phase of the Local Field Potentials (LFP); (4) the pattern-and-phase information carried by the spike patterns tagged with the LFP phase. We found that there is substantially more information in the rate-and-phase code compared with the firing rate alone for low LFP frequency bands (less than 30 Hz). When comparing how information is encoded across layers, we found that the extra information contained in a rate-and-phase code may reach 90 % in Layer 4, while in other layers it reaches only 60 %, compared to the information carried by the firing rate alone. These results suggest that information processing in primary sensory cortices could rely on different coding strategies across different layers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
Canada 2 4%
France 1 2%
Belarus 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 18%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 23%
Neuroscience 11 19%
Engineering 10 18%
Physics and Astronomy 5 9%
Computer Science 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 4 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2012.
All research outputs
#14,150,222
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#150
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,877
of 169,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.