↓ Skip to main content

The importance of Messel for interpreting Eocene Holarctic mammalian faunas

Overview of attention for article published in Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
The importance of Messel for interpreting Eocene Holarctic mammalian faunas
Published in
Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12549-012-0090-8
Authors

Kenneth D. Rose

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 49%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,306,523
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#311
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,624
of 187,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.