You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disease in Central Valley Salmon: Status and Lessons from Other Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.15447/sfews.2020v18iss3art2 |
| Authors |
Lehman, Brendan, Johnson, Rachel C., Adkison, Mark, Burgess, Oliver T., Connon, Richard E., Fangue, Nann A., Foott, J. Scott, Hallett, Sascha L., Martinez–López, Beatriz, Miller, Kristina M., Purcell, Maureen K., Som, Nicholas A., Valdes–Donoso, Pablo, Collins, Alison L. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,635,122
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
#133
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,946
of 409,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.