↓ Skip to main content

A three-state effective Hamiltonian for symmetric cationic diarylmethanes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Physics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A three-state effective Hamiltonian for symmetric cationic diarylmethanes
Published in
Journal of Chemical Physics, June 2012
DOI 10.1063/1.4728158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth Olsen, Ross H. McKenzie

Abstract

We analyze the low-energy electronic structure of a series of symmetric cationic diarylmethanes, which are bridge-substituted derivatives of Michler's Hydrol Blue. We use a four-electron, three-orbital complete active space self-consistent field and multi-state multi-reference perturbation theory model to calculate a three-state diabatic effective Hamiltonian for each dye in the series. We exploit an isolobal analogy between the active spaces of the self-consistent field solutions for each dye to represent the electronic structure in a set of analogous diabatic states. The diabatic states can be identified with the bonding structures in classical resonance-theoretic models of cyanine dyes. We identify diabatic states with opposing charge and bond-order localization, analogous to the classical resonance structures, and a third state with charge on the bridge. While the left- and right-charged structures are similar for all dyes, the structure of the bridge-charged diabatic state, and the Hamiltonian matrix elements connected to it, change significantly across the series. The change is correlated with an inversion of the sign of the charge carrier on the bridge, which changes from an electron pair to a hole as the series is traversed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 75%
Mathematics 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,696,691
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Physics
#1,615
of 19,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,793
of 177,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Physics
#10
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,825 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.