↓ Skip to main content

Behind the ‘Curve’: COVID-19, Infodemic, and Oral History

Overview of attention for article published in Oral History Review, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Behind the ‘Curve’: COVID-19, Infodemic, and Oral History
Published in
Oral History Review, September 2020
DOI 10.1080/00940798.2020.1798256
Authors

Stephen M. Sloan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Lecturer 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 10 32%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 29%
Arts and Humanities 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,909,577
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Oral History Review
#85
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,882
of 428,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oral History Review
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.