↓ Skip to main content

Impact of substituting added sugar in carbonated soft drinks by intense sweeteners in young adults in the Netherlands: example of a benefit–risk approach

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
498 Mendeley
Title
Impact of substituting added sugar in carbonated soft drinks by intense sweeteners in young adults in the Netherlands: example of a benefit–risk approach
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00394-010-0113-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marieke A. Hendriksen, Mariken J. Tijhuis, Heidi P. Fransen, Hans Verhagen, Jeljer Hoekstra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 498 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 496 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 81 16%
Student > Master 28 6%
Researcher 17 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 1%
Other 19 4%
Unknown 335 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 4%
Chemistry 7 1%
Psychology 6 1%
Other 36 7%
Unknown 364 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#633,162
of 25,362,520 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#172
of 2,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,723
of 102,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.