↓ Skip to main content

Poly‐gene fusion transcripts and chromothripsis in prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Genes, Chromosomes, and Cancer, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Poly‐gene fusion transcripts and chromothripsis in prostate cancer
Published in
Genes, Chromosomes, and Cancer, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/gcc.21999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunxiao Wu, Alexander W. Wyatt, Andrew McPherson, Dong Lin, Brian J. McConeghy, Fan Mo, Robert Shukin, Anna V. Lapuk, Steven J. M. Jones, Yongjun Zhao, Marco A. Marra, Martin E. Gleave, Stanislav V. Volik, Yuzhuo Wang, S. Cenk Sahinalp, Colin C. Collins

Abstract

Complex genome rearrangements are frequently observed in cancer but their impact on tumor molecular biology is largely unknown. Recent studies have identified a new phenomenon involving the simultaneous generation of tens to hundreds of genomic rearrangements, called chromothripsis. To understand the molecular consequences of these events, we sequenced the genomes and transcriptomes of two prostate tumors exhibiting evidence of chromothripsis. We identified several complex fusion transcripts, each containing sequence from three different genes, originating from different parts of the genome. One such poly-gene fusion transcript appeared to be expressed from a chain of small genomic fragments. Furthermore, we detected poly-gene fusion transcripts in the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, suggesting they may represent a common phenomenon. Finally in one tumor with chromothripsis, we identified multiple mutations in the p53 signaling pathway, expanding on recent work associating aberrant DNA damage response mechanisms with chromothripsis. Overall, our data show that chromothripsis can manifest as massively rearranged transcriptomes. The implication that multigenic changes can give rise to poly-gene fusion transcripts is potentially of great significance to cancer genetics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 28%
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Computer Science 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2012.
All research outputs
#16,063,069
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Genes, Chromosomes, and Cancer
#1,104
of 1,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,420
of 186,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes, Chromosomes, and Cancer
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,542 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.