↓ Skip to main content

Technical note: drifting versus anchored flux chambers for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from running waters

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeosciences, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technical note: drifting versus anchored flux chambers for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from running waters
Published in
Biogeosciences, December 2015
DOI 10.5194/bg-12-7013-2015
Authors

A. Lorke, P. Bodmer, C. Noss, Z. Alshboul, M. Koschorreck, C. Somlai-Haase, D. Bastviken, S. Flury, D. F. McGinnis, A. Maeck, D. Müller, K. Premke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 53 46%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Engineering 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biogeosciences
#3,617
of 4,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,313
of 399,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeosciences
#65
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.