Title |
Moving from Evidence-Based Medicine to Evidence-Based Health
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-010-1606-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Moskowitz, Thomas Bodenheimer |
Abstract |
While evidence-based medicine (EBM) has advanced medical practice, the health care system has been inconsistent in translating EBM into improvements in health. Disparities in health and health care play out through patients' limited ability to incorporate the advances of EBM into their daily lives. Assisting patients to self-manage their chronic conditions and paying attention to unhealthy community factors could be added to EBM to create a broader paradigm of evidence-based health. A perspective of evidence-based health may encourage physicians to consider their role in upstream efforts to combat socially patterned chronic disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 28% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 37% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
Psychology | 5 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2012.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,057
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,184
of 186,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#33
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.