| Title |
A new haplotype of “Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum” identified in the Mediterranean region
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-012-0121-3 |
| Authors |
Warrick R. Nelson, Venkatesan G. Sengoda, Ana O. Alfaro-Fernandez, Maria I. Font, James M. Crosslin, Joseph E. Munyaneza |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#230
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,640
of 202,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.