↓ Skip to main content

Adverse Outcomes in Relation to Polypharmacy in Robust and Frail Older Hospital Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
64 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adverse Outcomes in Relation to Polypharmacy in Robust and Frail Older Hospital Patients
Published in
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arjun Poudel, Nancye M. Peel, Lisa M. Nissen, Charles A. Mitchell, Leonard C. Gray, Ruth E. Hubbard

Abstract

To explore the relationship between polypharmacy and adverse outcomes among older hospital inpatients stratified according to their frailty status. A prospective study of 1418 patients, aged 70 and older, admitted to 11 hospitals across Australia. The interRAI Acute Care (AC) assessment tool was used for all data collection, including the derivation of a frailty index calculated using the deficit accumulation method. Polypharmacy was categorized into 3 groups based on the number of regular drugs prescribed. Recorded adverse health outcomes were falls, delirium, functional and cognitive decline, discharge to a higher level of care and in-hospital mortality. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 81 (6.8) years and 55% were women. Polypharmacy (5-9 drugs per day) was observed in 48.2% (n = 684) and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10 drugs) in 35.0% (n = 497). Severe cognitive impairment was significantly associated with nonpolypharmacy compared with polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy groups combined (P = .004). In total, 591 (42.5%) patients experienced at least 1 adverse outcome. The only adverse outcome associated with polypharmacy was delirium. Within each polypharmacy category, frailty was associated with adverse outcomes and the lowest overall incidence was among robust patients prescribed 10 or more drugs. While polypharmacy may be a useful signal for medication review, in this study it was not an independent predictor of adverse outcomes for older inpatients. Assessing the frailty status of patients better appraised risk. Extensive de-prescribing in all older inpatients may not be an intervention that directly improves outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Psychology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 42 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#906,774
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#170
of 3,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,056
of 368,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.