↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Phenomenology and Neuroimaging Correlates in ALS-FTD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Clinical Phenomenology and Neuroimaging Correlates in ALS-FTD
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12031-011-9636-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Lomen-Hoerth

Abstract

The overlap of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has been well documented in FTD patients with co-morbid motor neuron degeneration and in ALS patients with frontotemporal dysfunction. Up to 15% of FTD patients and 30% of ALS patients experience the overlap syndrome. The syndrome may be difficult to identify since patients often present either to a neuromuscular clinic or a memory disorder's center, each which may have limited expertise in the other specialty. Survival is greatly impacted for both disorders in the co-morbid condition, making identification of this syndrome critical. The clinical characteristics of the overlap syndrome with new diagnostic criteria will be discussed along with screening strategies, including the UCSF Screening battery and clinical neurophysiology techniques. Treatable mimics of this disorder will also be described and management techniques. Neuroimaging findings will be summarized, which show that the frontotemporal impairment in ALS patients lies on a continuum. Identification of the overlap syndrome also provides a unique opportunity to study very early signs of FTD and conversely, very early signs of ALS, to gain greater insight into both disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 2%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Psychology 13 15%
Neuroscience 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 26 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#428
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,742
of 144,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.