↓ Skip to main content

Alcohol Use, Anal Sex, and Other Risky Sexual Behaviors Among HIV-Infected Women and Men

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Alcohol Use, Anal Sex, and Other Risky Sexual Behaviors Among HIV-Infected Women and Men
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10461-012-0191-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidi E. Hutton, Mary E. McCaul, Geetanjali Chander, Mollie W. Jenckes, Christine Nollen, Victoria L. Sharp, Emily J. Erbelding

Abstract

Effective sexual risk reduction strategies for HIV-infected individuals require an understanding of alcohol's influence on specific sexual behaviors. We conducted audio-computer-assisted-self-interviews on 910 patients from two HIV primary care programs. The association between alcohol use and risky sexual behaviors was examined using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, education, race/ethnicity and drug use. Frequent/binge drinking was associated with engaging in anal sex and having multiple sex partners among women, engaging in insertive anal sex among gay/bisexual men, and was unrelated to risky sexual behaviors among heterosexual men. Infrequent drinkers did not differ in sexual risk behaviors from abstainers among women or men. Finally, there was no interaction effect between race/ethnicity and alcohol use on the association with sexual risk behaviors. The study has yielded important new findings in several key areas with high relevance to HIV care. Results underscore the importance of routinely screening for alcohol use and risky sexual behaviors in HIV primary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Psychology 7 12%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,396,539
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,354
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,567
of 165,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#35
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.