You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standardized evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: results of the ring studies of the international immuno-oncology biomarker working group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Modern Pathology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/modpathol.2016.109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carsten Denkert, Stephan Wienert, Audrey Poterie, Sibylle Loibl, Jan Budczies, Sunil Badve, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath, Anita Bane, Shahinaz Bedri, Jane Brock, Ewa Chmielik, Matthias Christgen, Cecile Colpaert, Sandra Demaria, Gert Van den Eynden, Giuseppe Floris, Stephen B Fox, Dongxia Gao, Barbara Ingold Heppner, S Rim Kim, Zuzana Kos, Hans H Kreipe, Sunil R Lakhani, Frederique Penault-Llorca, Giancarlo Pruneri, Nina Radosevic-Robin, David L Rimm, Stuart J Schnitt, Bruno V Sinn, Peter Sinn, Nicolas Sirtaine, Sandra A O'Toole, Giuseppe Viale, Koen Van de Vijver, Roland de Wind, Gunter von Minckwitz, Frederick Klauschen, Michael Untch, Peter A Fasching, Toralf Reimer, Karen Willard-Gallo, Stefan Michiels, Sherene Loi, Roberto Salgado |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 21% |
| Unknown | 55 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,809,897
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Modern Pathology
#616
of 3,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,403
of 370,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Modern Pathology
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.