↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Cognitive Disorders in HIV-Positive Individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Cognitive Disorders in HIV-Positive Individuals
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11904-016-0324-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Underwood, Alan Winston

Abstract

Antiretroviral therapy has revolutionised the treatment for people living with HIV (PLWH). Where antiretroviral coverage is high, the treatment paradigm for HIV-disease is now one of managing the long-term consequences of the virus and its treatment rather than the consequences of untreated HIV-disease such as immunosuppression and opportunistic infections. One such long-term consequence is HIV-associated cognitive impairment which is reported to occur in up to 50 % of treated PLWH and has been associated with poorer outcomes. Given the ageing cohort and increased frequency of comorbidities, the prevalence of symptomatic cognitive impairment may increase with time. High quality evidence for management strategies including screening, diagnosis and treatment of HIV-associated cognitive impairment are lacking and in general guidelines are based on best clinical practice. In this article, we assessed recent guidelines concerning the management of HIV-associated cognitive impairment by performing a systematic review of the MEDLINE database using PubMed. We report that, in general, guidelines from around the world regarding the management of HIV-associated cognitive impairment are converging. Screening is generally not recommended in asymptomatic PLWH. Diagnosis of HIV-associated cognitive impairment should be made only after a comprehensive assessment and exclusion of other potential causes. Antiretroviral therapy forms the cornerstone of management of HIV-associated cognitive impairment and should be guided by plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) genotype(s).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 37%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Psychology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,629,861
of 23,845,863 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#163
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,493
of 355,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,845,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.