↓ Skip to main content

Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Genomics, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands
Published in
Microbial Genomics, October 2020
DOI 10.1099/mgen.0.000436
Pubmed ID
Authors

Finlay Maguire, Baofeng Jia, Kristen L. Gray, Yin Venus Lau, Robert G. Beiko, Fiona S. L. Brinkman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 21%
Researcher 32 19%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 18%
Computer Science 9 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 59 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,407,959
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Genomics
#109
of 1,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,814
of 434,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Genomics
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.