You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating airborne remote sensing and field campaigns for ecology and Earth system science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.13463 |
| Authors |
K. Dana Chadwick, Philip G. Brodrick, Kathleen Grant, Tristan Goulden, Amanda Henderson, Nicola Falco, Haruko Wainwright, Kenneth H. Williams, Markus Bill, Ian Breckheimer, Eoin L. Brodie, Heidi Steltzer, Charles F. Rick Williams, Benjamin Blonder, Jiancong Chen, Baptiste Dafflon, Joan Damerow, Matt Hancher, Aizah Khurram, Jack Lamb, Corey R. Lawrence, Maeve McCormick, John Musinsky, Samuel Pierce, Alexander Polussa, Maceo Hastings Porro, Andea Scott, Hans Wu Singh, Patrick O. Sorensen, Charuleka Varadharajan, Bizuayehu Whitney, Katharine Maher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 52% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,341,824
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#550
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,666
of 429,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#21
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.