↓ Skip to main content

Comparative in silico analyses and experimental validation of novel splice site and missense mutations in the genes MLH1 and MSH2

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Comparative in silico analyses and experimental validation of novel splice site and missense mutations in the genes MLH1 and MSH2
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00432-009-0643-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beate Betz, Stephan Theiss, Murat Aktas, Carolin Konermann, Timm O. Goecke, Gabriela Möslein, Heiner Schaal, Brigitte Royer-Pokora

Abstract

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, an autosomal dominant predisposition to colorectal cancer and other malignancies, is caused by inactivating mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes, mainly MLH1 and MSH2. Missense mutations affect protein structure or function, but may also cause aberrant splicing, if located within splice sites (ss) or cis-acting sequences of splicing regulatory proteins, i.e., exonic splicing enhancers or exonic splicing silencers. Despite significant progress of ss scoring algorithms, the prediction for the impact of mutations on splicing is still unsatisfactory. For this study, we assessed ten ss and nine missense mutations outside ss in MLH1 and MSH2, including eleven newly identified mutations, and experimentally analyzed their effect at the RNA level. We additionally tested and compared the reliability of several web-based programs for the prediction of splicing outcome for these mutations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 7%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 34%
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Computer Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,601,772
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#570
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,105
of 113,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.