↓ Skip to main content

カント道徳論に対するルソーの影響

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy (Tetsugaku), May 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 173)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
カント道徳論に対するルソーの影響
Published in
Philosophy (Tetsugaku), May 1986
DOI 10.11439/philosophy1952.1986.152
Authors

中村 博雄

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,930,960
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy (Tetsugaku)
#24
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,890
of 10,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy (Tetsugaku)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them