↓ Skip to main content

Dietary trans‐Fatty Acid Induced NASH is Normalized Following Loss of trans‐Fatty Acids from Hepatic Lipid Pools

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Dietary trans‐Fatty Acid Induced NASH is Normalized Following Loss of trans‐Fatty Acids from Hepatic Lipid Pools
Published in
Lipids, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11745-012-3709-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brent A. Neuschwander‐Tetri, David A. Ford, Sahaja Acharya, George Gilkey, Metin Basaranoglu, Laura H. Tetri, Elizabeth M. Brunt

Abstract

Previous experiments in mice showed that dietary trans-fats could play a role in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) yet little is known about the accumulation trans-fats in hepatic lipid pools in relationship to liver injury. NASH is also associated with obesity yet improves with only modest weight loss. To distinguish the role of obesity versus sustained consumption of a trans-fat containing diet in causing NASH, mice with obesity and NASH induced by consuming a high trans-fat diet for 16 weeks were subsequently fed standard chow or maintained on trans-fat chow for another 8 weeks. The accumulation, partitioning and loss of trans-fats in the major hepatic lipid pools during and after trans-fat consumption were determined. Obese mice switched to standard chow remained obese but steatohepatitis improved. trans-fats were differentially incorporated into the major hepatic lipid pools and the loss of trans-fats after crossover to control chow was greatest in the cholesteryl ester pool. In summary, dietary changes can improve the biochemical and histopathological changes of NASH despite persistent obesity in mice. Analysis of hepatic lipids confirmed that dietary trans-fats accumulate in the major lipid pools and are released differentially with diet normalization. The substantial loss of trans-fats from the cholesteryl ester pool in parallel with improvement in NASH suggests that this pool of trans-fats could play a role in the pathogenesis of NASH.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Student > Master 8 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#22,255,835
of 24,837,507 outputs
Outputs from Lipids
#1,791
of 1,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,587
of 176,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,507 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.