You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A scoping review of cost benefit analysis in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: What we know and what are the gaps?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Policy & Planning, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1093/heapol/czw078 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chandana Maitra, Andrew Hodge, Eliana Jimenez Soto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Canada | 4 | 14% |
| Cameroon | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 7% |
| Kenya | 2 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,315,135
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Health Policy & Planning
#195
of 2,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,063
of 367,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Policy & Planning
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.