↓ Skip to main content

Organic Bioelectronics: Bridging the Signaling Gap between Biology and Technology

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical Reviews, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
431 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
660 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Organic Bioelectronics: Bridging the Signaling Gap between Biology and Technology
Published in
Chemical Reviews, July 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel T. Simon, Erik O. Gabrielsson, Klas Tybrandt, Magnus Berggren

Abstract

The electronics surrounding us in our daily lives rely almost exclusively on electrons as the dominant charge carrier. In stark contrast, biological systems rarely use electrons but rather use ions and molecules of varying size. Due to the unique combination of both electronic and ionic/molecular conductivity in conducting and semiconducting organic polymers and small molecules, these materials have emerged in recent decades as excellent tools for translating signals between these two realms and, therefore, providing a means to effectively interface biology with conventional electronics-thus, the field of organic bioelectronics. Today, organic bioelectronics defines a generic platform with unprecedented biological recording and regulation tools and is maturing toward applications ranging from life sciences to the clinic. In this Review, we introduce the field, from its early breakthroughs to its current results and future challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 660 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 652 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 186 28%
Researcher 111 17%
Student > Master 79 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 5%
Other 84 13%
Unknown 121 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 136 21%
Materials Science 106 16%
Engineering 97 15%
Physics and Astronomy 52 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 4%
Other 89 13%
Unknown 155 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,660,283
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Reviews
#1,459
of 5,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,392
of 361,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Reviews
#25
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.