↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research

Overview of attention for article published in Operations Management Research, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the reshoring and insourcing decision making process: toward an agenda for future research
Published in
Operations Management Research, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12063-016-0113-0
Authors

Lydia Bals, Jon F. Kirchoff, Kai Foerstl

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 73 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 75 35%
Engineering 35 16%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 4%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 76 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,335,423
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Operations Management Research
#30
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,696
of 352,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Operations Management Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.