↓ Skip to main content

Appreciation, Use, and Management of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in California’s Working Landscapes

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Title
Appreciation, Use, and Management of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in California’s Working Landscapes
Published in
Environmental Management, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00267-012-9900-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Plieninger, Shasta Ferranto, Lynn Huntsinger, Maggi Kelly, Christy Getz

Abstract

"Working landscapes" is the concept of fostering effective ecosystem stewardship and conservation through active human presence and management and integrating livestock, crop, and timber production with the provision of a broad range of ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Based on a statewide survey of private landowners of "working" forests and rangelands in California, we investigated whether owners who are engaged in commercial livestock or timber production appreciate and manage biodiversity and ecosystem services on their land in different ways than purely residential owners. Both specific uses and management practices, as well as underlying attitudes and motivations toward biodiversity and ecosystem services, were assessed. Correlation analysis showed one bundle of ecosystem goods and services (e.g., livestock, timber, crops, and housing) that is supported by some landowners at the community level. Another closely correlated bundle of biodiversity and ecosystem services includes recreation, hunting/fishing, wildlife habitat, and fire prevention. Producers were more likely to ally with the first bundle and residential owners with the second. The survey further confirmed that cultural ecosystem services and quality-of-life aspects are among the primary amenities that motivate forest and rangeland ownership regardless of ownership type. To live near natural beauty was the most important motive for both landowner groups. Producers were much more active in management for habitat improvement and other environmental goals than residential owners. As the number of production-oriented owners decreases, developing strategies for encouraging environment-positive management by all types of landowners is crucial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 6 3%
Australia 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 206 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 28%
Student > Master 48 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 24 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 91 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 23%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 46 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2012.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#1,406
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,612
of 177,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.