↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of zygote survival of native and non-native walleye stocks in two Georgian Bay rivers

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Biology of Fishes, December 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of zygote survival of native and non-native walleye stocks in two Georgian Bay rivers
Published in
Environmental Biology of Fishes, December 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00007532
Authors

Michael G. Fox

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Other 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Environmental Science 4 36%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,485,894
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#493
of 1,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,276
of 70,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,766 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them