↓ Skip to main content

Running related gluteus medius function in health and injury: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,140)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Running related gluteus medius function in health and injury: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.06.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Semciw, Racheal Neate, Tania Pizzari

Abstract

Running is a popular sport and recreational physical activity worldwide. Musculoskeletal injuries in runners are common and may be attributed to the inability to control pelvic equilibrium in the coronal plane. This lack of pelvic control in the frontal plane can stem from dysfunction of the gluteus medius. The aim of this systematic review was therefore to: (i) compile evidence of the activity profile of gluteus medius when running; (ii) identify how gluteus medius activity (electromyography) varies with speed, cadence and gender when running; (iii) compare gluteus medius activity in injured runners to matched controls. Seven electronic databases were searched from their earliest date until March 2015. Thirteen studies met our eligibility criteria. The activity profile was mono-phasic with a peak during initial loading (four studies). Gluteus medius amplitude increases with running speed; this is most evident in females. The muscles' activity has been recorded in injured runners with Achilles tendinopathy (two studies) and patellofemoral pain syndrome (three studies). The strongest evidence indicates a moderate and significant reduction in gluteus medius duration of activity when running in people with patellofemoral pain syndrome. This dysfunction can potentially be mediated with running retraining strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 242 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 21%
Student > Bachelor 39 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 18 7%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 55 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 61 25%
Sports and Recreations 52 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 16%
Engineering 6 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 72 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#663,721
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
#17
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,031
of 369,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.