↓ Skip to main content

On the convergence of von Neumann's alternating projection algorithm for two sets

Overview of attention for article published in Set-Valued and Variational Analysis, June 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
On the convergence of von Neumann's alternating projection algorithm for two sets
Published in
Set-Valued and Variational Analysis, June 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01027691
Authors

H. H. Bauschke, J. M. Borwein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 50%
Student > Master 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 21 53%
Computer Science 8 20%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Set-Valued and Variational Analysis
#3
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,829
of 19,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Set-Valued and Variational Analysis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them