↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic efficacy and therapeutic impact of computed tomography in the evaluation of clinically suspected otosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic efficacy and therapeutic impact of computed tomography in the evaluation of clinically suspected otosclerosis
Published in
European Radiology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00330-016-4446-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Dudau, Fakhruddin Salim, Dan Jiang, Steve E. J. Connor

Abstract

To assess the diagnostic efficacy and therapeutic impact of CT in evaluating patients with clinically suspected otosclerosis. CT scans performed over a 5-year period for clinically suspected otosclerosis were retrospectively reviewed. CT diagnoses were correlated with subsequent surgical management. For otosclerosis positive cases, clinically significant extensions of otosclerosis were correlated with audiometry and the diagnosis was correlated with surgical findings. Of 259 CT studies, 46 % of patients were positive, 49 % negative and 5 % equivocal for otosclerosis. A relevant alternative CT diagnosis was evident in 33 % of the negative studies. One targeted surgery was performed for every four CT studies. CT outcome influenced the decision to perform stapedectomy in 41 % CT-positive versus 4 % CT-negative patients. CT-positive ears for otosclerosis could not be predicted from baseline clinical or audiometric criteria. Those with endosteal extension demonstrated lower bone conduction thresholds presurgically. The positive predictive value of CT diagnosis of otosclerosis was 100 %. CT demonstrated a high rate of clinically relevant diagnoses in both CT-positive and -negative for otosclerosis patients, and this frequently influenced surgical management. CT also added value by demonstrating relevant extensions of the otosclerotic foci, some of which were predictive of audiometric parameters. • CT demonstrates a high rate of alternative diagnoses in suspected otosclerosis, 1:3. • CT results in a high rate of targeted surgery in suspected otosclerosis, 1:4. • CT prevents exploratory surgery in suspected otosclerosis. • Endosteal extension of otosclerosis is predictive of lower bone conduction tresholds presurgically. • The PPV of CT diagnosis of otosclerosis was 100 %.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 15%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#12,767,056
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,829
of 4,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,521
of 351,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#18
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.