| Title |
Two‐stage Reimplantation for Treating Prosthetic Shoulder Infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-1774-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vani J. Sabesan, Jason C. Ho, David Kovacevic, Joseph P. Iannotti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,065
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,262
of 136,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#14
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.