↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound guidance improves the accuracy of the acromioclavicular joint infiltration: a prospective randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound guidance improves the accuracy of the acromioclavicular joint infiltration: a prospective randomized study
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00167-010-1197-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Sabeti‐Aschraf, B. Lemmerhofer, S. Lang, M. Schmidt, P. T. Funovics, P. Ziai, S. Frenzel, A. Kolb, A. Graf, C. Schueller‐Weidekamm

Abstract

Degeneration of the acromioclavicular joint (AC) often causes impaired shoulder function and pain. Its infiltration results in reportedly beneficial short-term effects. Misplacement of infiltrations is observed in high numbers. A previous study showed high accuracy of infiltrations of one surgeon comparing conventional palpation technique to ultrasound guidance. This study evaluates if ultrasound-guided AC joint infiltration is feasible for therapists of different levels of experience and if the accuracy can be increased. One hundred and twenty AC joints of 60 cadavers were enrolled into a prospective, randomized observer-blinded study. Six therapists of three different levels of experience infiltrated 20 AC joints each. Half of them were infiltrated after palpation of the joint space, half of them were ultrasound-guided infiltrated. Controls were performed pre- and post-infiltration by an independent radiologist. In total, accurate infiltration was observed in 70%. In 25%, misplacement of the infiltration was recorded in the palpation-, in 2% in the ultrasound- and in 3% in both groups. The difference between the two groups was significant (P = 0.009). Ultrasound-guided infiltration to the AC joint is significantly more accurate than conventional palpation technique. This method is simple, efficient and can be applied by therapists of all levels of experience.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,079,076
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#466
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,912
of 93,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.